Measuring Personality

Two economists will never agree on what will yank the world out of recession. Two psychologists will also give you a simple answer on how to measure personality. What is personality? How you describe yourself is the inside view of personality (also called identity).  It is all about your dreams, hopes and fears and how you wish to achieve your dreams and avoid the fear factor.When someone does a reference check about say a potential employee or team member, they are seeking to learn about the personality elements. What is this person going to be like as a team member? What kind of reputation does the person have?  Reputation is based on past behavior trends. Successful hiring is based on getting information about three areas:

1.The Role:Is the employee going to have clear boundaries and structure or will the employee be expected to deal with ambiguity.  Does it require someone to interact with customers (especially when they are unhappy). Does it need someone with attention to details or a person who is a strategic thinker who relies on others to look into the nitty gritties. Does this role need someone who should has to handle stress. Is this primarily a sales job or is a managerial role?

2.The Culture:This is specific to an organization. The same role maybe expected to operate differently in a green field operation as compared to one in a turnaround scenario. The same role may have vastly differing levels of empowerment depending on the organization’s culture.  What are the values of the organization? Who are the heroes and villains of the organization and what values do they represent? Is it a blow your own trumpet culture or is that behavior seen as crude and not encouraged?

3. The Individual: What is the fit of the individual with the role and the organizational culture. The more senior the employee is in the pecking order, the more important is the need to find resonance between the individual and the company culture – especially if the mandate of the role is not to make that change. A CEO who is successful in a startup may not be as effective in maintaining steady state.Before you rush out and hire the next person, detail out as much as you can about the success factors of the role. To understand the organization’s culture, look at what is common to the employees who are successful. What common behavior do they demonstrate? While all organizations will enthusiastically vote in favor of teamwork, check if those who eventually succeeded and were hailed by the leaders were individual stars or were they team players. Do the same analysis to know what was common to those who were brought in with great fanfare and yet they failed. That will be important to know whom to hire when several candidates share equally impressive track records.

Here is a great framework to learn about the individual. I like this one and generates insights that may be used for hiring decisions as well as for coaching.The Hogan Personality Inventory evaluates the individual on the following aspects:

  1. Adjustment: People who are high on this have high confidence, self-esteem, and show composure under pressure. This is useful to know especially if the person will be in a high stress role.

  2. Ambition: This is a measure of the person’s initiative, competitiveness, and desire to take on leadership roles. Good information to have for evaluating senior leaders.

  3. Sociability: This measures gregarious, and need for social interaction. If a person shows high need for sociability, putting the person in a role that demands working for long hours by themselves is not a good idea.

  4. Interpersonal Sensitivity: A person who is high on this shows tact, perceptiveness, and ability to maintain relationships. Maybe a good trait to evaluate for roles which have a high customer interface.

  5. Prudence: People who are high on prudence play by the rule-book and are high on self-discipline, responsibility and conscientiousness.

  6. Inquisitive: This is a good predictor of creative potential. People high on this show strong imagination and are curious.

  7. Learning Approach: Strong scores on this come from people who are achievement-oriented and love to stay current on their knowledge. Certainly useful information for the role of a scientist.

These seven traits help gain a better knowledge of person-job fit. Even if you are not trained in using this inventory, you may find the framework really handy. They may provide you useful pointers when you speak to an applicant’s referees whether they are colleagues, managers or team members. Doing a thorough reference check that looks for trends in behavior (after all everyone can have a bad day) may be a good way to make an informed decision about the potential hire. Don’t forget to spend as much time and effort analyzing the demands of the role and the organization’s culture and expectations from that role.

Check out Hogan’s blog http://www.thescienceofpersonality.com/ for some really good thought provoking articles.


Comments

4 responses to “What to Assess While Hiring”

  1. Good One!!!

  2. Jody Allen Avatar

    Classic review and analysis Abbie. The only thing I could possibly add to consider when hiring is this, always hire someone smarter than yourself.

  3. Hi AbhijitNice one – I have some things to put in:- In these days hiring should comprise 70 to 80 percent of competency check, and the remaining can hold a mix of the others. Its true that experience brings out a lot in the person, but there are a lot of young and capable individuals who sometimes match the competencies required for a job.- For this its very important to hire for the role (as you said) and not giving attention to the person per se. In case interview is the methodology, strictly use only structured interviews which ask ONLY questions related to the job, and nothing else. The same set of questions should be asked to all. For this a thorough review of the Job Description for the job is essential. Putting a competency framework for each level of the company also helps. Nothing’s better than knowing what exact competencies are required for the role.- I for one strongly recommend tests like Hogan’s Inventory. Also try combinations of DISC + PIAV etc. which are good methods for hiring, and can really give great insights about one’s personality- Checks for organization culture are really important, however most HR and Line Managers fail to understand their own company culture themselves. The CEO plays an important role at this point – to communicate the culture to the employees.- Background checks help, but ancilliary information and past experience may not. As far as what I have seen, a large number of people are in jobs only because “it just happened to them”. People really dont know their strengths and which job they would do best in. Hence past experience cannot be a great indicator (though its extensively used in India & other countries). A strong competency check, social abilities check, references from past employers etc helps in knowing the person much better.I know – a lot of gyaan from a not very experienced person – but hope it adds some value 🙂

  4. Abhijit,Thanks for the references. Normally personality assessments are considered indicators of “preference” rather than “ability” of any sort. Ofcourse any test of ability gets into the zone of high IQs – the likes of mensa clubs etc.Having said that, this one certainly appears interesting .. as it looks primarily from adaptability/adjustability of the person from the organization culture point of view .. hopefully much more scientifically than any intutive methods currently.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *