Times of IndiaIs Fidelity Outdated? When you ask such a question on Valentine’s Day, it tends to grab attention. Anuradha Verma of The Times of India asks this question in today’s edition of the paper’s lifestyle section. Pritish Nandy, Suchitra Krishnamurthy, Rupa Ganguly have all shared their views. I got to share space with them because the title of my second novel ie Married But Available 🙂

Columnist and film maker Pritish Nandy says, “Fidelity is not the issue. Has never been. What is at issue is fidelity on demand. You cannot get fidelity on demand in a marriage or any other relationship for that matter. People are faithful when they love someone enough to give up every other option, every other choice. And trust me, despite the contempt with which it is treated by many people today, fidelity is still pretty much common. It is not that impossibility which we think it is.”

Actor Rupa Ganguly‘s view is that, “… due to exposure, people’s expectations have grown. They get dissatisfied, and this leads them to cheat. It’s a fast life, and everybody’s ambitious. Patience levels have dropped and that feeling called love is easily lost in this frenzy. One doesn’t stay in love for very long. However, while in a relationship, people still want to be loyal, and infidelity causes a lot of pain.”Actor, singer, writer Suchitra Krishnamurthy says, “As some men get caught, more and more cases come to the forefront. Men can no longer afford to show off their conquests. They now have to hide their affairs. This could well mean fidelity is back as a lasting fashion statement. Infidelity is a reality. There are few relationships untouched by it. Today, women too are experimenting. There is a shift in consciousness.”

books@abhijitbhaduri.comHere is what I had mentioned in the phone interview. Sometimes an edited version does not do justice to the idea.  Tell me what you think of it.The explosion of social media has created many more shades of relationships. Social media is also redefining conversations that is the basis of all relationships. A relationship forms when conversations begin. Media is making multiple relationships happen. As the conversations evolve, the relationship evolves. Society changes when ever evolving conversations start creating new forms of relationships that have not existed before. Urban India has given a grudging acceptance to live in relationships and divorces which were frowned upon even a few years back. Movies and television serials are getting more comfortable showing a spectrum of human relationships that even a few years ago would have been taboo. Think of films like DevD (read more here) which is a contemporary take on a love story. Or more recently the film Ishqiya. They depict relationships that exist comfortably in the shades of grey.  Fidelity as a notion has also been evolving from being black and white to shades of grey. The definition of fidelity is understood only when people choose fidelity despite choices being available.  Thoughts are free. We cannot control them. So it is certainly possible to feel attracted to a person. However to act on that thought is a choice people make. It is a bit like this popular painting which at first sight looks like one face but actually has nine different faces built in. Just take a closer look. There is more to it than meets the eye at first glance.—————–Read the article Is Fidelity Outdated on the Times of India site. Click hereReview of DevD at http://www.abhijitbhaduri.com/2009/02/devd/Read about the film Ishqiya at http://www.abhijitbhaduri.com/2010/01/ishqiya/Source of painting: http://www.facedetection.com/facedetection/misc.htm


Comments

3 responses to “Is Fidelity Outdated”

  1. true that possible types of relationships exploded with social n/w, media etc., but some things still remain fundamental to human civilization,e.g. principle of ‘not hurting others w/o any real reason’, emotional ‘atyachaar’ is also ‘atyachaar’ nevertheless, at times worse than physical ones. Think what’s imp here is to remember there r always 2 SIDES of a relationship, and these 2 sides must move in sync so as not to overstretch the thread- which can be extremely delicate to extremely tough- depending on the participating sides n situations. E.g., if both sides are willing to flirt n are ok with it, no probs. But if one wants and the other feels bad about it, then it need not be pursued….. Simple! what’s so grey about that?

  2. why so much fuss on natural urge and desires ?? Fidelity and unfidelity shall continue to exist in society ( as per individual’s convictions, beliefs and actions)..as has been till date since AGES.. and man has always been lured n charmed with body, beauty and brains despite whatever sorts of rules and norms you fix..and little bit of spice / variety/ variations/ a difference/ something new / just a thrill or any clear or vague stimulus shall keep the man/woman in lookout for these things..and being a consentual adult act, we unnecessarily try to infiltrate / intervene in other’s affairs.Aur bhi gum hain zamane mein..is issue pe discussion ke siwa !!

  3. The real downfall of India started when the Khajuraho temples were built. The public display of eroticism is against Hinduism. The Khajuraho temples were built from 950 AD – 1150 AD. And shortly after that, Shahabuddin Ghori invaded India in 1175. The erotic sculptures in the Khajuraho temples need to be “broken” out and replaced with beautiful “paintings” of Hindu Gods. There is an argument that these foreign rulers saved India from Mongol invasion, but if Khajuraho temples were never built, even Mongols would have been defeated. Even Alexander the Great attacked India but failed, although western historians made another story out of it but Alexander was defeated. No one who won India ever returned back. Only those who were defeated returned back. For India to regain its old glory, Khajuraho temples and other temples where erotic sculptures/paintings are displayed, they need to go. Pornography is against Hinduism. One can have as much sex as one wants but adultery and pornography is against Hinduism. The erotic sculptures in the Khajuraho temples and other temples need to be “broken” out and replaced with beautiful “paintings” of Hindu Gods. And then India will rise and will remain at the top.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *